Crime Today News | Latest Crime Reports

What sparked the violent protest in Nepal

What sparked the violent protest in Nepal

Nepali Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli on Tuesday resigned from his post amid a widespread protest against corruption and his government.

Oli’s resignation came a day after the agitation triggered by the Nepali government’s ban on more than two dozen social media platforms turned violent. The clashes with security forces on Monday led to the deaths of 19 persons. Around 400 protesters were injured in the clashes.

Amid pressure from the public, the Oli government lifted the social media ban on Monday night.

But while the social media ban may have been the immediate trigger, there were other underlying factors that led to the violent protest that escalated so quickly.

The protests continued on Tuesday, with demonstrators vandalising government buildings and setting the Parliament complex and houses of ministers, including Oli’s private residence, on fire.

The demonstrations have been described as a protest mainly by “Gen Z”, generally referring to persons born between 1995 and 2010.

Santosh Sharma Poudel, co-founder of the Nepal Institute for Policy Research, told Scroll that in his view, Nepali citizens had great hopes about the prospects for good governance in 2006 when the monarchy was overthrown and then again in 2015 when the country adopted a new constitution.

“But the feeling is that corruption has increased and more people have had to leave the country for livelihood,” Poudel said. “People who had the means would go to the West, those who didn’t have the means had to go to the Middle East.”

So the general sentiment was that “there is no hope in Nepal”, he explained.

After Nepal became a republic in 2008 and the new constitution was adopted, the “system changed but people remained the same”, Poudel said, adding that “governance remained the same and corruption increased”.

“Leaders getting attacked shows the level of anger that the youth had,” he said.

He added: “The burning of the institutions indicates that the youth feels that they have no stake in the country anymore. So why keep the remnants at all? So the Parliament, Supreme Court, offices of political parties are gone. The feeling is that we don’t need political parties, we don’t need the government and the existing judiciary.”

An aerial view shows demonstrators gathered outside Nepal’s Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu on September 8, 2025. Photo: Prabin Ranabhat/AFP

What happens next?

Yet, the agitation and its intensity was unexpected for observers. What they are sure about is that it is a movement led by the youth.

Poudel said that the leaders of the agitation seem to be mainly Balen Shah, a 35-year-old rapper and the mayor of Kathmandu, and Rastriya Swatantra Party chief Ravi Lamichhane, a 49-year-old who served as the deputy prime minister between March and July 2024.

Both leaders are relatively young, he said, adding that the older people were merely supporting the youth leading from the front.

What happens next remains unclear.

“We don’t know what the new normal will be like,” Poudel said. “The system has collapsed. Will it come back in its old form, a revised form or something new will come up – we’ll have to wait and see,”

The solution, he added, will have to be approved by the protest leaders. The security forces also seem to have understood that for a solution, they need to step back and negotiate, Poudel added.

A pattern in South Asia?

As the protests escalated on Monday, some social media users claimed that what was happening in Nepal was part of a wider pattern in South Asia of governments being toppled. They noted the ouster of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in Bangladesh in August 2024 and the agitation that removed the Rajapaksa clan from power in Sri Lanka in 2022.

But Poudel said that it is difficult to establish if there was external interference involved.

“The way the protest has taken place and spread, I don’t think any external manipulation would have led to this extent,” he said. “There was external interference during the Maoist revolution [or the Nepali civil war between 1996 and 2006] and often that’s a relatively slow process over a longer period of time.”

He added: “Was there some moral support [to the protesters] behind the scenes? Possible. But for the time being I’ll give full credit to the protesters.”


Source

📰 Crime Today News is proudly sponsored by DRYFRUIT & CO – A Brand by eFabby Global LLC

Design & Developed by Yes Mom Hosting

Crime Today News

Crime Today News brings you breaking stories, deep investigations, and critical insights into crime, justice, and society. Our team is committed to factual reporting and fearless journalism that matters.

Related Posts