The Supreme Court of India has voiced strong concern over the treatment of doctors who lost their lives while serving during the COVID-19 pandemic, warning that society would not forgive the state if it failed to care for those who had cared for everyone else.

The observation came while a bench comprising Justice P. S. Narasimha and Justice R. Mahadevan was hearing a petition questioning the criteria for insurance coverage under government schemes meant for healthcare professionals who died due to the virus. After hearing arguments from all sides, the Court reserved its verdict in the matter.

During the proceedings, Justice Narasimha remarked that doctors had risked their own lives to protect others at a time of national crisis, and that it was both a moral and legal obligation of the government to ensure that their families received the protection and compensation they deserved. He said that if the state failed to support the medical community, it would lose the trust of the people and the gratitude owed to those who made the ultimate sacrifice. The bench pointed out that many doctors who treated patients throughout the pandemic were not officially listed as being on “COVID duty,” yet they worked in private clinics or hospitals and faced the same dangers as those working in government facilities. Therefore, the court stated that these doctors and their families should not be excluded from insurance benefits merely because of bureaucratic technicalities.

The justices made it clear that the Court’s role was not to decide each individual claim but to establish broad principles that could guide future cases. They identified two key conditions that should determine eligibility for insurance coverage: first, that the deceased doctor was actively engaged in providing medical services during the pandemic, and second, that the death was caused by a COVID-19 infection. They further explained that it should not matter whether the doctor was treating COVID-specific patients or offering general medical care, as long as they continued their service to society during that critical time.

To verify such claims, the bench said that credible evidence showing that the doctor’s clinic or hospital was functioning during the pandemic would be sufficient. It urged the government and insurance providers to process legitimate claims without unnecessary hurdles, reminding them that the purpose of such schemes was to offer relief, not to deny it through technical objections. Justice Narasimha stressed that compassion and fairness must guide the implementation of these policies, rather than rigid adherence to procedural formality.

The Supreme Court also directed the Central Government to submit details of all existing schemes that provide financial or insurance support to doctors and healthcare workers, including the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Package and other similar programs.

The judges indicated that the forthcoming decision could serve as a framework for broader policy reform, helping to fill gaps in existing insurance coverage and ensuring that no medical professional’s family is left without assistance in the future.

By reserving its judgment, the Court signaled that it would issue comprehensive directions after reviewing the submissions. The hearing reflects a wider recognition of the sacrifices made by medical professionals during the pandemic and the need for the state to uphold its duty toward them.

The Supreme Court’s stance reinforces that the nation’s gratitude must go beyond words—it must translate into real, tangible support for those who served humanity at great personal risk.

📰 Crime Today News is proudly sponsored by DRYFRUIT & CO – A Brand by eFabby Global LLC

Design & Developed by Yes Mom Hosting