Claude 4 Review: Good, Bad, or Waste of Time?

SUMMARY—THE ENTIRE ARTICLE IN 30 SECONDS

Anthropic has launched Claude 4, featuring two new AI models: Opus 4 and Sonnet 4. Think of them as super-smart digital assistants. Opus 4 is the powerhouse, excelling at complex tasks like coding (it can work for 7+ hours straight!) and deep research, making it arguably the best coding AI out there. Sonnet 4 is a faster, more efficient model for everyday tasks.

Both models boast an impressive memory, understanding hundreds of pages of text, which helps them follow long, complicated instructions. While Sonnet 4 is comparable to ChatGPT for simple queries, Opus 4 truly shines for intricate, multi-step projects. You can try Sonnet 4 for free, while the more powerful Opus 4 is available through a $20/month paid plan. It’s highly recommended for programmers and anyone dealing with complex work, offering a reliable, intelligent helper for demanding tasks.

STOP HERE IF YOU’RE IN A RUSH – READ ON FOR FULL DETAILS

Look, AI models are just fancy computer helpers. Think of them like having a really smart friend who’s read everything on the internet. Claude 4 is the newest one from Anthropic, and here’s everything you need to know without the tech gibberish.

THE BOTTOM LINE (30 SECONDS)

Claude 4 is Anthropic’s newest set of AI models, like a major software update for a super-smart digital helper. There are two main versions: Opus 4 (the “super-genius,” built for the really tough stuff) and Sonnet 4 (a balanced, efficient workhorse).

• What it does: It assists you in complex coding, analyzing tons of data, writing, researching, and even brainstorming.
• Best for: Programmers, without a doubt. If you want the best AI assistant for coding, Claude is for you.
• Should you try it? YES—it’s simple to use and works like a charm.
• Cost: Free version available; paid is $20/month.

WHAT MAKES THIS ONE SPECIAL

THE BIG DEAL

• Claude 4 Opus truly shines in coding. This version can reportedly work on it for 7+ hours straight without losing its mind or forgetting what it’s doing. An actual game-changer.

THREE COOL NEW THINGS

• “Extended Thought”: Claude can now “think” deeper, planning many steps ahead to finish complex tasks on its own. It’s like having a smart assistant who truly understands the whole project.
• Parallel Multi-Tool Use: Claude can use many different digital tools at the same time. This makes it super fast and efficient at tackling tricky jobs by bringing in all the help it needs.
• Persistent Local Memory Files: Claude can “remember” our past conversations and important details. This helps it understand long discussions and continue tasks smoothly, even if we take a break.

THE “WOW” EXAMPLE:

Imagine asking Claude 4, “Build me a website that tracks my pet’s health.” In mere minutes, it not only writes all the code but also designs the layout and even automatically fixes any glitches, creating a fully working, personalized site out of thin air.

HOW GOOD IS IT REALLY

REPORT CARD

• Writing help: A+
• Coding: A+ (currently the best AI assistant for coding)
• Math problems: A
• Following directions: A+
• Speed: B+ (Not the fastest, but it makes it worth the wait)

VS. THE COMPETITION:

• Beats ChatGPT at: coding, handling huge amounts of info, and following complex instructions.
• Beats Google’s AI at: deep/logical problem solving, safer/more cautious replies, and advanced software engineering.
• Not as good at: It lacks multimodality (“seeing” and “hearing”), somewhat strict usage limits.

REAL EXAMPLES YOU CAN TRY TODAY

IF YOU’RE NEW TO AI:

• Ask it to summarize a very long article so you can read it faster and get the key points more easily.
• Ask it to write a story for you based on the parameters (characters, setting, tone, etc.) you want.
• Ask it to make plans for you. This works for both simple dates and entire trips.

IF YOU USE AI FOR WORK:

• Ask it to review code to ensure it adheres to certain parameters and is free of vulnerabilities.
• Ask it for ideas for potentially effective marketing strategies you can implement in your fledgling business.
• Ask it to simulate conversations with clients so you’re prepared for their potential requests and questions.

MONEY TALK

PRICING:

• Free version: Claude Sonnet 4 with limits (limited messages, no Opus access, less memory).
• Paid version: $20/month gives you access to Opus 4 and advanced features (file uploads, extended thinking, more memory, and longer chats).
• Worth paying for? Yes, especially if you are a professional coder, but it also works for many other areas.

EASE OF USE:

• Learning difficulty: Easy.
• Why: You can type all your requests in natural language. No complex commands required.
• Setup time: 2 minutes to sign up.

THE HONEST TRUTH

WHAT’S GREAT:

• It’s like having a super-genius programmer who can write and fix code for you.
• It can break down very complex tasks, plan out thousands of tiny steps, and then carry them out over hours without getting confused.
• Opus 4 can “remember” details and keep track of information over very long periods. This is ideal for huge projects.

WHAT SUCKS:

• While the basic AI-powered options are “free” (with limits), it’s not the cheapest option out there.
• Even Opus 4 can’t “see” what’s in a picture you upload, “hear” what you say, or understand videos.
• It might take a tiny bit longer to give you an answer for a very simple question than other AIs.

SHOULD YOU BOTHER

TRY IT IF YOU:

• You’re learning to code or need coding help (be it basic or advanced).
• You need to summarize mountains of information quickly and create reports/documents based on it.
• You want help brainstorming creative ideas for anything.

SKIP IT IF YOU:

• Only need simple, quick answers and don’t want to pay.
• Your tasks require generating images or creative visuals.
• You are looking for a wide usage limit without paying.

USE CHATGPT INSTEAD IF:

• If you need quick answers, higher usage limits, and multimedia analysis/generation.

SUMMARY

THE ESSENTIALS:

• What Claude 4 does best: tackles incredibly complex thinking, advanced coding, and following detailed, multi-step instructions.
• Main weakness: Doesn’t “see” images or “hear” audio as good as others; can be pricey for top-tier access; slower for quick answers.
• Best for professionals needing deep analysis, coding help, or meticulous task automation.
• Skip if: You only need quick facts, work with visuals/audio, or want a completely free tool.
• Price: Free version (Sonnet 4) has usage limits; Pro $20/month tier (Opus 4) offers more power.

THE VERDICT:

• Overall grade: A (Excellent for its strengths, but has specific limitations).
• Worth your time? Yes, definitely worth trying if you have complex text-based or coding tasks.
• Better than ChatGPT? For deep logic, complex coding, and strict instruction following, yes; for visuals/audio, no.

FINAL RECOMMENDATION:

• Coders should definitely try at least the free version. Even if you reach the usage limits, you may want to upgrade to a paid tier later. Yes, it’s that good!

HOW TO START

GETTING STARTED:

• Step 1: Go to claude.ai.
• Step 2: Sign up with your email or Google account.
• Step 3: First test: Ask it to “help me build a simple website about my hobby” and watch it work.

FINAL VERDICT:

• Our rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars.
• Bottom line: Claude 4 can be an ideal AI assistant for professionals (especially coders).
• Call to action: Tried it? Love it? Hate it? Tell us in the comments!

The post Claude 4 Review: Good, Bad, or Waste of Time? appeared first on Android Headlines.

This article first appeared on Android Headlines