A Delhi court has reserved its order on a criminal complaint seeking action against Congress Parliamentary Party Chairperson Sonia Gandhi, alleging that her name was included in the voters’ list in the national capital even before she formally acquired Indian citizenship. The matter came up before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaibhav Chaurasia at the Rouse Avenue Court Complex, where arguments were heard at length from the complainant’s side.

The complaint was filed by advocate Vikas Tripathi, who has accused Gandhi of having been unlawfully registered as a voter in 1980 despite being an Italian national at the time. According to him, Gandhi’s name appeared on the electoral rolls in 1980, was deleted in 1982, and re-entered in 1983—by which time she is said to have been granted Indian citizenship in April 1983. Tripathi’s senior counsel, Pavan Narang, told the court that this sequence is not a mere clerical error but suggests deliberate misrepresentation, potentially amounting to a criminal offence under election and penal laws.

Invoking Section 175(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), the petitioner urged the court to direct the registration of an FIR and order a police investigation into what he claims was an illegal entry into India’s electoral system. He submitted that being listed on the voters’ roll without citizenship undermines the sanctity of the democratic process and could not have occurred without the use of false documents.

Magistrate Chaurasia, however, refrained from immediately issuing notice to Sonia Gandhi or to the Delhi Police. Instead, the court observed that the voluminous records presented require careful judicial scrutiny before any coercive directions can be passed. The order has been reserved, and its pronouncement is awaited.

The issue is politically sensitive, as Gandhi’s citizenship and early years in Indian politics have long been subjects of debate. Married to former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1968, she lived in India for years before formally applying for and acquiring citizenship in 1983. Her foreign origin has frequently been raised by political rivals, most prominently during the 1999 Lok Sabha elections and again in 2004, when she declined the prime ministership amidst a heated opposition campaign against her Italian roots.

In this instance too, the controversy has drawn sharp political reactions. Earlier this year, the BJP, through its leaders and IT cell, alleged that Gandhi’s inclusion in the 1980 Delhi voters’ list before her citizenship was a serious irregularity. Party spokespersons claimed that it reflected a “systematic subversion of the law,” questioning how electoral authorities could have permitted such an anomaly. These allegations were widely circulated in media reports and used to renew political attacks on the Congress leadership.

Legal experts, however, remain divided. Some argue that even if Gandhi’s name did appear on the rolls prior to 1983, responsibility would lie primarily with the election officers of the time, rather than with her personally, unless direct evidence emerges of false declarations made by her. Others insist that the matter is too grave to be dismissed lightly, given that the right to vote is constitutionally tied to Indian citizenship, and any deviation undermines electoral legitimacy.

For Sonia Gandhi herself, this petition is yet another addition to the series of legal and political challenges she has faced in her decades-long career at the helm of the Congress party. Although she stepped back from active electoral politics in recent years, controversies of this nature continue to shadow her legacy.

The Rouse Avenue court is now expected to deliver its order in the coming weeks. If the magistrate directs registration of an FIR, it could trigger a formal police investigation, potentially reviving a decades-old controversy with fresh legal consequences. If dismissed, however, the case may end up as another instance where allegations surrounding Gandhi’s citizenship and electoral eligibility remain politically potent but legally inconclusive.

📰 Crime Today News is proudly sponsored by DRYFRUIT & CO – A Brand by eFabby Global LLC

Design & Developed by Yes Mom Hosting